Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs question: HEIGHT parameter #397

Closed
Tyler-2 opened this issue May 25, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

docs question: HEIGHT parameter #397

Tyler-2 opened this issue May 25, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@Tyler-2
Copy link

Tyler-2 commented May 25, 2022

HEIGHT: Antenna height in feet

Is this height above ground, height above sea level, or height above average terrain? Unqualified I think most people would just put height above ground. But this is used to generate PHG parameters and PHG uses HAAT.

I suspect it is HAAT, but I'd like clarification in the docs to confirm.

@dranch
Copy link
Collaborator

dranch commented May 25, 2022

This isn't a Direwolf thing per se but an APRS thing. Per http://www.aprs.org/phg.html :

PHG stands for Power-Height-Gain (and directivity) which is all you need to calculate the relative RF range of a station. The most important parameter being Height Above Average Terrain. Because the FCC has a rigorous method of mathematically calculating, some poeople think that HAAT takes on some exact, almost mystical meaning. When in fact, it is just the simple Height of your antenna over the surrounding area that it serves. Notice that Height above sealevel means absolutely nothing. It is your heigh over everything around you that is important.

@Tyler-2
Copy link
Author

Tyler-2 commented May 25, 2022

I'm familiar with PHG parameters, but the Direwolf documentation says:

HEIGHT: Antenna height in feet

I think that should say

HEIGHT: Antenna height above average terrain, in feet

if that's accurate.

@wb2osz
Copy link
Owner

wb2osz commented May 19, 2023

Thank you for pointing this out.
The (not yet released) next User Guide clarifies this.

73,
John WB2OSZ

@wb2osz wb2osz closed this as completed May 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants