You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that when I send a message from my phone (APRSDroid) via APRS-IS, when my Direwolf digi picks it up and then tries to TX to RF, it seems to mangle the "header":
Shouldn't it? While I'm not sure how IGate paths are supposed to be preserved/represented, it doesn't seem like the WIDE1-2:} that is inserted in the current case is correct, nor the changing of the packet to have "originated" from K1MLN-2.
The current case doesn't look like it would even be routable...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
"WIDE1-2" is highly unusual. Some digipeaters might discard it depending on the configuration.
You probably want to change the IGate configuration to use "WIDE1-1,WIDE2-1".
Otherwise it looks normal.
An IGate station wraps the original packet in a third party header.
That way it has both the RF station transmitting this new packet and it retains the original sending station.
When properly functioning APRS implementations see the "}" data type indicator, they process everything after it to obtain a modified version of the original packet.
Thank you, looks like this format wasn't a mistake, it's just something I'm unfamiliar with. I'll read up on the docs. Two things I've already learned:
Just because you're sending stuff to APRS-IS doesn't mean you can crank up the beacon rates.
The main reason I even noticed this was that my nearby digi wasn't digipeating my igate->RF packets.... But it is probably because it had a filter configured to not do so. I'll correct that next time I have access to it.
Thanks for the careful and informative reply, it was probably more than I deserved!
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I noticed that when I send a message from my phone (APRSDroid) via APRS-IS, when my Direwolf digi picks it up and then tries to TX to RF, it seems to mangle the "header":
I think this should look more like:
Shouldn't it? While I'm not sure how IGate paths are supposed to be preserved/represented, it doesn't seem like the
WIDE1-2:}
that is inserted in the current case is correct, nor the changing of the packet to have "originated" from K1MLN-2.The current case doesn't look like it would even be routable...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: