-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 313
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AX.25/IL2P Switch #505
Comments
Dire Wolf already has a REGENERATE option which causes an incoming frame to be resent without modification. |
Lookup Table - Not unlike an ethernet mac table, so that you could use direwolf to build a bridge/switch that would only forward frames to ports that it had a destination for I just read the section for REGENERATE, and that might do it combined with some form of filtering |
direwolf has a packet filtering capability (see User Guide) which can allow or block packets depending on their characteristics. it would not be a big stretch to make it work like an ethernet switch. Can you give me the big picture on what you are trying to achieve? 73, |
John, Thanks for all the quick communication. I'm really just kind of spit balling a little. There is a group out of NC that came up with this style of packet built up on dedicated links (TARPN). I'm just trying to explore ways to help packet networks scale better. This all on one frequency stuff is a little rough once you get just a few transmitters on the same frequency, but having some sort of dedicated packet switch of sorts that can operate on a few or many frequencies and bands, I think would be incredibly useful. The equipment has gotten a lot cheaper. And Direwolf seems like a really good platform. Do you have a chat server or anything up that folks idle in, like a users channel or anything like that? 73's John N3XKD |
Would it be possible, or does direwolf today support the ability to be a frame switch ? So unlike a digipeater, it would receive a frame on one RF interface and pass that frame on to another RF interface based on a lookup table. Is this something that requires direwolf to be attached to an external program today ? Thanks in advance
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: