Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DireWOlf virtual TNC and ARDOP #63

Closed
sp2ong opened this issue Oct 29, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

DireWOlf virtual TNC and ARDOP #63

sp2ong opened this issue Oct 29, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@sp2ong
Copy link

sp2ong commented Oct 29, 2016

Hi,
It will be fine that DireWolf will be have support new hamradio protocol ARDOP http://www.winlink.org/content/ardop_overview
I know that exist ARDOP source by G8BPQ which implement in BPQ32 software https://github.com/g8bpq/LinBPQ/blob/master/ARDOP.c

or use ARDOP version C by G8BPQ https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/31910649/ARDOPC.txt

It maybe will easy or not :-) add ARDOP use via Sound card and with RMS Express or other Winlink application like PAT Wilnik client: https://github.com/la5nta/pat

73 Waldek SP2ONG

@dranch
Copy link
Collaborator

dranch commented Oct 29, 2016

Just my $0.02 but Direwolf is an AX.25 TNC and APRS client/gateway. ARDOP has no relation to packet or AX.25 and Ithink of it much more along the lines of Pactor. As you mentioned, there is a Linux version of ARDOP now and the BPQ BBS software has API support for it which is a version of BPQ's SCS Pactor TNC support. Other than that, as you mentioned, Pat does support ARDOP (though an older version). Once ARDOP code development settles down, I have little doubt PAT will catch up support it.

@wb2osz
Copy link
Owner

wb2osz commented Jun 18, 2017

After looking over all the ARDOP documentation, I have pretty much the same reaction as dranch.
Dire Wolf is a software replacement for a traditional AX.25 Terminal Node Controller (TNC) box. It has simple modems and knowledge of the AX.25 protocol and APRS.
ARDOP is an entirely different animal. From what I see, it is used to set up a reliable communication with one other station at a time. So it is good for conversations or moving large amounts of data like AX.25 connected mode. BBS or e-mail applications could use either one to move data reliably between two points.
I didn't notice any broadcast to anyone mode that would allow APRS to be layered on top of it.
In summary, I really don't see how they would fit together.

@wb2osz wb2osz closed this as completed Jun 18, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants